Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The ITAT Delhi considered the issue of adjusting seized fixed deposits with advance tax liability. The assessee requested adjustment on 11.04.2012, before filing a belated return on 26.03.2013. The tribunal held that the request was towards self-assessment tax, irrespective of the filing date. Lower authorities overlooked this. The seized deposits were later adjusted against regular tax arrears. The tribunal directed the AO to adjust the deposits towards self-assessment tax from 11.04.2012, recalculating interest u/s 234B. Adjustments made towards regular tax should be reversed.
The ITAT Delhi considered the issue of adjusting seized fixed deposits with advance tax liability. The assessee requested adjustment on 11.04.2012, before filing a belated return on 26.03.2013. The tribunal held that the request was towards self-assessment tax, irrespective of the filing date. Lower authorities overlooked this. The seized deposits were later adjusted against regular tax arrears. The tribunal directed the AO to adjust the deposits towards self-assessment tax from 11.04.2012, recalculating interest u/s 234B. Adjustments made towards regular tax should be reversed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
