Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
The ITAT Delhi considered the issue of adjusting seized fixed deposits with advance tax liability. The assessee requested adjustment on 11.04.2012, before filing a belated return on 26.03.2013. The tribunal held that the request was towards self-assessment tax, irrespective of the filing date. Lower authorities overlooked this. The seized deposits were later adjusted against regular tax arrears. The tribunal directed the AO to adjust the deposits towards self-assessment tax from 11.04.2012, recalculating interest u/s 234B. Adjustments made towards regular tax should be reversed.
The ITAT Delhi considered the issue of adjusting seized fixed deposits with advance tax liability. The assessee requested adjustment on 11.04.2012, before filing a belated return on 26.03.2013. The tribunal held that the request was towards self-assessment tax, irrespective of the filing date. Lower authorities overlooked this. The seized deposits were later adjusted against regular tax arrears. The tribunal directed the AO to adjust the deposits towards self-assessment tax from 11.04.2012, recalculating interest u/s 234B. Adjustments made towards regular tax should be reversed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.