Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The ITAT Delhi considered the issue of adjusting seized fixed deposits with advance tax liability. The assessee requested adjustment on 11.04.2012, before filing a belated return on 26.03.2013. The tribunal held that the request was towards self-assessment tax, irrespective of the filing date. Lower authorities overlooked this. The seized deposits were later adjusted against regular tax arrears. The tribunal directed the AO to adjust the deposits towards self-assessment tax from 11.04.2012, recalculating interest u/s 234B. Adjustments made towards regular tax should be reversed.
The ITAT Delhi considered the issue of adjusting seized fixed deposits with advance tax liability. The assessee requested adjustment on 11.04.2012, before filing a belated return on 26.03.2013. The tribunal held that the request was towards self-assessment tax, irrespective of the filing date. Lower authorities overlooked this. The seized deposits were later adjusted against regular tax arrears. The tribunal directed the AO to adjust the deposits towards self-assessment tax from 11.04.2012, recalculating interest u/s 234B. Adjustments made towards regular tax should be reversed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
