Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The ITAT Delhi considered the issue of adjusting seized fixed deposits with advance tax liability. The assessee requested adjustment on 11.04.2012, before filing a belated return on 26.03.2013. The tribunal held that the request was towards self-assessment tax, irrespective of the filing date. Lower authorities overlooked this. The seized deposits were later adjusted against regular tax arrears. The tribunal directed the AO to adjust the deposits towards self-assessment tax from 11.04.2012, recalculating interest u/s 234B. Adjustments made towards regular tax should be reversed.
The ITAT Delhi considered the issue of adjusting seized fixed deposits with advance tax liability. The assessee requested adjustment on 11.04.2012, before filing a belated return on 26.03.2013. The tribunal held that the request was towards self-assessment tax, irrespective of the filing date. Lower authorities overlooked this. The seized deposits were later adjusted against regular tax arrears. The tribunal directed the AO to adjust the deposits towards self-assessment tax from 11.04.2012, recalculating interest u/s 234B. Adjustments made towards regular tax should be reversed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
