Transfer pricing comparables and adjustments: Tribunal revisits loss-maker status, segmental comparability, working capital relief, and risk allocatio...
Business expenditure disallowance failed where commission, related-party salary and promotion payments were supported by records and inquiry was inade...
The legal judgment by CESTAT Allahabad addressed the issue of refund of accumulated Cenvat Credit for goods exported without payment of duty and not under bond. The tribunal held that refund is permissible even for goods exempt from duty, and export under bond is a procedural requirement. Citing precedent cases, it emphasized that input credit is allowable for exports of exempted goods under bond. The appellant was deemed eligible for Cenvat Credit refund under Rule 5 of CCR, 2004, despite the procedural lapse of not submitting a bond. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.
The legal judgment by CESTAT Allahabad addressed the issue of refund of accumulated Cenvat Credit for goods exported without payment of duty and not under bond. The tribunal held that refund is permissible even for goods exempt from duty, and export under bond is a procedural requirement. Citing precedent cases, it emphasized that input credit is allowable for exports of exempted goods under bond. The appellant was deemed eligible for Cenvat Credit refund under Rule 5 of CCR, 2004, despite the procedural lapse of not submitting a bond. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
