Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The legal judgment by CESTAT Allahabad addressed the issue of refund of accumulated Cenvat Credit for goods exported without payment of duty and not under bond. The tribunal held that refund is permissible even for goods exempt from duty, and export under bond is a procedural requirement. Citing precedent cases, it emphasized that input credit is allowable for exports of exempted goods under bond. The appellant was deemed eligible for Cenvat Credit refund under Rule 5 of CCR, 2004, despite the procedural lapse of not submitting a bond. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.
The legal judgment by CESTAT Allahabad addressed the issue of refund of accumulated Cenvat Credit for goods exported without payment of duty and not under bond. The tribunal held that refund is permissible even for goods exempt from duty, and export under bond is a procedural requirement. Citing precedent cases, it emphasized that input credit is allowable for exports of exempted goods under bond. The appellant was deemed eligible for Cenvat Credit refund under Rule 5 of CCR, 2004, despite the procedural lapse of not submitting a bond. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
