Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The ITAT Delhi held that the notice issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer u/s 148 was invalid. The jurisdiction over the assessee was with a different officer, and the officer who issued the notice did not have the authority. The assumption of jurisdiction by the non-jurisdictional officer for reopening the assessment was deemed unlawful. The assessment completed by the correct officer was upheld, and the reassessment proceedings initiated by the incorrect officer were deemed invalid. The decision favored the assessee.
The ITAT Delhi held that the notice issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer u/s 148 was invalid. The jurisdiction over the assessee was with a different officer, and the officer who issued the notice did not have the authority. The assumption of jurisdiction by the non-jurisdictional officer for reopening the assessment was deemed unlawful. The assessment completed by the correct officer was upheld, and the reassessment proceedings initiated by the incorrect officer were deemed invalid. The decision favored the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
