Post-search scrutiny assessment remains available where original assessment limitation is unexpired, permitting timely completion under regular assess...
Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Page of 4788
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
121 to 140 of 95752 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT Pune ruled on two key issues: 1) Treatment of subsidy under IPS Scheme 2007 for depreciation calculation - Held that subsidy should not be reduced from actual cost of fixed assets u/s 43(1) for depreciation calculation, following precedent. Directed AO to delete the addition of depreciation. 2) Disallowance of claim u/s 80-IA - Held that CIT(A) was justified in directing AO to allow deduction u/s 80IA(4)(iv)(a) without deducting brought forward loss or unabsorbed depreciation on notional basis, based on previous assessment years.
The ITAT Pune ruled on two key issues: 1) Treatment of subsidy under IPS Scheme 2007 for depreciation calculation - Held that subsidy should not be reduced from actual cost of fixed assets u/s 43(1) for depreciation calculation, following precedent. Directed AO to delete the addition of depreciation. 2) Disallowance of claim u/s 80-IA - Held that CIT(A) was justified in directing AO to allow deduction u/s 80IA(4)(iv)(a) without deducting brought forward loss or unabsorbed depreciation on notional basis, based on previous assessment years.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.