Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
CESTAT Hyderabad held that Cenvat Credit cannot be claimed on Clean Energy Cess (CEC) as it is not covered u/s 37 of the Central Excise Act. Previous rulings support this decision. Interest was not demanded in the Adjudication Order, and the penalty imposed was set aside. The appeal was partly allowed, affirming the denial of Cenvat Credit on CEC.
CESTAT Hyderabad held that Cenvat Credit cannot be claimed on Clean Energy Cess (CEC) as it is not covered u/s 37 of the Central Excise Act. Previous rulings support this decision. Interest was not demanded in the Adjudication Order, and the penalty imposed was set aside. The appeal was partly allowed, affirming the denial of Cenvat Credit on CEC.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
