Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
CESTAT Hyderabad held that Cenvat Credit cannot be claimed on Clean Energy Cess (CEC) as it is not covered u/s 37 of the Central Excise Act. Previous rulings support this decision. Interest was not demanded in the Adjudication Order, and the penalty imposed was set aside. The appeal was partly allowed, affirming the denial of Cenvat Credit on CEC.
CESTAT Hyderabad held that Cenvat Credit cannot be claimed on Clean Energy Cess (CEC) as it is not covered u/s 37 of the Central Excise Act. Previous rulings support this decision. Interest was not demanded in the Adjudication Order, and the penalty imposed was set aside. The appeal was partly allowed, affirming the denial of Cenvat Credit on CEC.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
