Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
CESTAT Hyderabad held that Cenvat Credit cannot be claimed on Clean Energy Cess (CEC) as it is not covered u/s 37 of the Central Excise Act. Previous rulings support this decision. Interest was not demanded in the Adjudication Order, and the penalty imposed was set aside. The appeal was partly allowed, affirming the denial of Cenvat Credit on CEC.
CESTAT Hyderabad held that Cenvat Credit cannot be claimed on Clean Energy Cess (CEC) as it is not covered u/s 37 of the Central Excise Act. Previous rulings support this decision. Interest was not demanded in the Adjudication Order, and the penalty imposed was set aside. The appeal was partly allowed, affirming the denial of Cenvat Credit on CEC.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
