Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
CESTAT Hyderabad held that Cenvat Credit cannot be claimed on Clean Energy Cess (CEC) as it is not covered u/s 37 of the Central Excise Act. Previous rulings support this decision. Interest was not demanded in the Adjudication Order, and the penalty imposed was set aside. The appeal was partly allowed, affirming the denial of Cenvat Credit on CEC.
CESTAT Hyderabad held that Cenvat Credit cannot be claimed on Clean Energy Cess (CEC) as it is not covered u/s 37 of the Central Excise Act. Previous rulings support this decision. Interest was not demanded in the Adjudication Order, and the penalty imposed was set aside. The appeal was partly allowed, affirming the denial of Cenvat Credit on CEC.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
