Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Initially claim filed without challenging the self-assessed Bills of Entry - During the appeal process, the appellant sought to amend the bills of entry, which was initially rejected but later allowed by the High Court. The High Court directed the amendment of bills of entry to reflect the correct duty rate, enabling the appellant to seek a refund of excess duty paid. Following the High Court's directive, the Adjudicating Authority granted the refund, stating that there was no unjust enrichment based on evidence provided.
Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Initially claim filed without challenging the self-assessed Bills of Entry - During the appeal process, the appellant sought to amend the bills of entry, which was initially rejected but later allowed by the High Court. The High Court directed the amendment of bills of entry to reflect the correct duty rate, enabling the appellant to seek a refund of excess duty paid. Following the High Court's directive, the Adjudicating Authority granted the refund, stating that there was no unjust enrichment based on evidence provided.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
