Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Levy of Penalty u/s 112 - Scope of the show cause notice - The CESTAT noted that, no show cause notice has been issued proposing the demand of differential duty or the penalty. On adjudication, the penalty was imposed only under section 114A of the Act and there was no reference at all to the provisions of section 112 of the Act - The Tribunal found that the appellate authority had no jurisdiction to impose a penalty u/s 112 when the original penalty was imposed u/s 114A. The Commissioner (Appeals) had set aside the penalty u/s 114A and imposed a penalty u/s 112, which was beyond their jurisdiction.
Levy of Penalty u/s 112 - Scope of the show cause notice - The CESTAT noted that, no show cause notice has been issued proposing the demand of differential duty or the penalty. On adjudication, the penalty was imposed only under section 114A of the Act and there was no reference at all to the provisions of section 112 of the Act - The Tribunal found that the appellate authority had no jurisdiction to impose a penalty u/s 112 when the original penalty was imposed u/s 114A. The Commissioner (Appeals) had set aside the penalty u/s 114A and imposed a penalty u/s 112, which was beyond their jurisdiction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
