Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Validity of reopening the assessment u/s 147 - Additions u/s 68 and u/s 69A - Cash deposits in assessee’s bank account - The ITAT observed that, the AO was satisfied that the assessee owned agricultural land and sold the same during this assessment year - The Tribunal concluded that the reopening of the assessment was valid, but the additions made by the AO and CIT(A) were not justified as the assessee had sufficiently explained the source of cash deposits. The appeal was partly allowed, and the additions made u/s 68 and 69A were set aside.
Validity of reopening the assessment u/s 147 - Additions u/s 68 and u/s 69A - Cash deposits in assessee’s bank account - The ITAT observed that, the AO was satisfied that the assessee owned agricultural land and sold the same during this assessment year - The Tribunal concluded that the reopening of the assessment was valid, but the additions made by the AO and CIT(A) were not justified as the assessee had sufficiently explained the source of cash deposits. The appeal was partly allowed, and the additions made u/s 68 and 69A were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.