Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Validity of reopening the assessment u/s 147 - Additions u/s 68 and u/s 69A - Cash deposits in assessee’s bank account - The ITAT observed that, the AO was satisfied that the assessee owned agricultural land and sold the same during this assessment year - The Tribunal concluded that the reopening of the assessment was valid, but the additions made by the AO and CIT(A) were not justified as the assessee had sufficiently explained the source of cash deposits. The appeal was partly allowed, and the additions made u/s 68 and 69A were set aside.
Validity of reopening the assessment u/s 147 - Additions u/s 68 and u/s 69A - Cash deposits in assessee’s bank account - The ITAT observed that, the AO was satisfied that the assessee owned agricultural land and sold the same during this assessment year - The Tribunal concluded that the reopening of the assessment was valid, but the additions made by the AO and CIT(A) were not justified as the assessee had sufficiently explained the source of cash deposits. The appeal was partly allowed, and the additions made u/s 68 and 69A were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.