Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Validity of reopening the assessment u/s 147 - Additions u/s 68 and u/s 69A - Cash deposits in assessee’s bank account - The ITAT observed that, the AO was satisfied that the assessee owned agricultural land and sold the same during this assessment year - The Tribunal concluded that the reopening of the assessment was valid, but the additions made by the AO and CIT(A) were not justified as the assessee had sufficiently explained the source of cash deposits. The appeal was partly allowed, and the additions made u/s 68 and 69A were set aside.
Validity of reopening the assessment u/s 147 - Additions u/s 68 and u/s 69A - Cash deposits in assessee’s bank account - The ITAT observed that, the AO was satisfied that the assessee owned agricultural land and sold the same during this assessment year - The Tribunal concluded that the reopening of the assessment was valid, but the additions made by the AO and CIT(A) were not justified as the assessee had sufficiently explained the source of cash deposits. The appeal was partly allowed, and the additions made u/s 68 and 69A were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.