Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Income deemed to accrue or arise in India - revenue characterization - Taxability of IUC [Interconnect utility charges] as Royalty u/s 9(1)(vi) - DTAA between India and Hongkong - The Tribunal noted that there is no treaty between India and Hong Kong, the country of which the assessee is a tax resident. The Tribunal held that the payments received by the assessee cannot be held to be royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Act. The revenue did not establish a permanent establishment of the assessee in India to tax the receipt in India. The payments received by the assessee are considered business profits taxable in the recipient country.
Income deemed to accrue or arise in India - revenue characterization - Taxability of IUC [Interconnect utility charges] as Royalty u/s 9(1)(vi) - DTAA between India and Hongkong - The Tribunal noted that there is no treaty between India and Hong Kong, the country of which the assessee is a tax resident. The Tribunal held that the payments received by the assessee cannot be held to be royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Act. The revenue did not establish a permanent establishment of the assessee in India to tax the receipt in India. The payments received by the assessee are considered business profits taxable in the recipient country.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.