Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4800
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96000 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Time Limitation - Rejection of appeal filed by the petitioner - Physical copies being submitted on 24.04.2023, beyond the condonable period while electronic filing was within the time limit - The Court found that the petitioner substantially complied with the filing requirements by referencing the assessment order already available on the department website while filing the appeal electronically. The Court held that the appeal was filed within time and remitted the matter back to the 1st respondent for registration and decision according to the law and rules. The approach of the 1st respondent in considering the physical filing date was deemed unacceptable, emphasizing that electronic filing is a facilitation for taxpayers.
Time Limitation - Rejection of appeal filed by the petitioner - Physical copies being submitted on 24.04.2023, beyond the condonable period while electronic filing was within the time limit - The Court found that the petitioner substantially complied with the filing requirements by referencing the assessment order already available on the department website while filing the appeal electronically. The Court held that the appeal was filed within time and remitted the matter back to the 1st respondent for registration and decision according to the law and rules. The approach of the 1st respondent in considering the physical filing date was deemed unacceptable, emphasizing that electronic filing is a facilitation for taxpayers.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
