Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) r.w.s. 274 - additional income declared in the return filed in response to notice u/s 153A as compared to original returned filed u/s 139(1) - There was no allegation of concealment or inaccurate particulars of income made by the Ld. AO or Ld. CIT(A) as the additional income was voluntarily disclosed in the return filed u/s 153A without any incriminating material found. - The Tribunal (ITAT) ultimately ruled in favor of the appellant, deleting both penalties levied u/s 271(1)(c).
Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) r.w.s. 274 - additional income declared in the return filed in response to notice u/s 153A as compared to original returned filed u/s 139(1) - There was no allegation of concealment or inaccurate particulars of income made by the Ld. AO or Ld. CIT(A) as the additional income was voluntarily disclosed in the return filed u/s 153A without any incriminating material found. - The Tribunal (ITAT) ultimately ruled in favor of the appellant, deleting both penalties levied u/s 271(1)(c).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
