Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Validity of o Ex parte scrutiny assessment order u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144B - The court highlighted the importance of oral hearing in assessment proceedings, stating that it is essential for an effective discussion and a reasoned conclusion by the Assessing Officer. It was emphasized that assessment orders should be passed after giving the assessee an opportunity to present their case, and oral hearing remains a near-mandatory requirement to ensure a just and proper order.
Validity of o Ex parte scrutiny assessment order u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144B - The court highlighted the importance of oral hearing in assessment proceedings, stating that it is essential for an effective discussion and a reasoned conclusion by the Assessing Officer. It was emphasized that assessment orders should be passed after giving the assessee an opportunity to present their case, and oral hearing remains a near-mandatory requirement to ensure a just and proper order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.