Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Validity of o Ex parte scrutiny assessment order u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144B - The court highlighted the importance of oral hearing in assessment proceedings, stating that it is essential for an effective discussion and a reasoned conclusion by the Assessing Officer. It was emphasized that assessment orders should be passed after giving the assessee an opportunity to present their case, and oral hearing remains a near-mandatory requirement to ensure a just and proper order.
Validity of o Ex parte scrutiny assessment order u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144B - The court highlighted the importance of oral hearing in assessment proceedings, stating that it is essential for an effective discussion and a reasoned conclusion by the Assessing Officer. It was emphasized that assessment orders should be passed after giving the assessee an opportunity to present their case, and oral hearing remains a near-mandatory requirement to ensure a just and proper order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.