Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Rectification u/s 154 - Substitution of addition u/s 269SS with 69A - unsecured loans - assessee engaged in banking business - Enhancement of tax liability u/s 115BBE - The ITAT Ahmedabad, after hearing both parties, found discrepancies in the application of sections 269SS and 69A to the cooperative bank's case. The rectification order was deemed a typographical error without proper verification. The ITAT directed the AO to reexamine the applicability of section 69A, ensuring proper evidence and hearing, and allowed the appeals partly for statistical purposes.
Rectification u/s 154 - Substitution of addition u/s 269SS with 69A - unsecured loans - assessee engaged in banking business - Enhancement of tax liability u/s 115BBE - The ITAT Ahmedabad, after hearing both parties, found discrepancies in the application of sections 269SS and 69A to the cooperative bank's case. The rectification order was deemed a typographical error without proper verification. The ITAT directed the AO to reexamine the applicability of section 69A, ensuring proper evidence and hearing, and allowed the appeals partly for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.