Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Rectification u/s 154 - Substitution of addition u/s 269SS with 69A - unsecured loans - assessee engaged in banking business - Enhancement of tax liability u/s 115BBE - The ITAT Ahmedabad, after hearing both parties, found discrepancies in the application of sections 269SS and 69A to the cooperative bank's case. The rectification order was deemed a typographical error without proper verification. The ITAT directed the AO to reexamine the applicability of section 69A, ensuring proper evidence and hearing, and allowed the appeals partly for statistical purposes.
Rectification u/s 154 - Substitution of addition u/s 269SS with 69A - unsecured loans - assessee engaged in banking business - Enhancement of tax liability u/s 115BBE - The ITAT Ahmedabad, after hearing both parties, found discrepancies in the application of sections 269SS and 69A to the cooperative bank's case. The rectification order was deemed a typographical error without proper verification. The ITAT directed the AO to reexamine the applicability of section 69A, ensuring proper evidence and hearing, and allowed the appeals partly for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.