Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rectification u/s 154 - Substitution of addition u/s 269SS with 69A - unsecured loans - assessee engaged in banking business - Enhancement of tax liability u/s 115BBE - The ITAT Ahmedabad, after hearing both parties, found discrepancies in the application of sections 269SS and 69A to the cooperative bank's case. The rectification order was deemed a typographical error without proper verification. The ITAT directed the AO to reexamine the applicability of section 69A, ensuring proper evidence and hearing, and allowed the appeals partly for statistical purposes.
Rectification u/s 154 - Substitution of addition u/s 269SS with 69A - unsecured loans - assessee engaged in banking business - Enhancement of tax liability u/s 115BBE - The ITAT Ahmedabad, after hearing both parties, found discrepancies in the application of sections 269SS and 69A to the cooperative bank's case. The rectification order was deemed a typographical error without proper verification. The ITAT directed the AO to reexamine the applicability of section 69A, ensuring proper evidence and hearing, and allowed the appeals partly for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.