Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
CIRP - Dismissal of application filed u/s 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Distinction between financial debt owed by the Corporate Debtor and the lack of privity of contract between the parties. - Despite claims by the appellants that the money was not repaid, the Tribunal found that there was no legal obligation on the part of the Corporate Debtor to repay the loan disbursed to the vendor. The Tribunal highlighted the lack of evidence supporting the money given as a loan, leading to the dismissal of the application under Section 7 of the IBC.
CIRP - Dismissal of application filed u/s 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Distinction between financial debt owed by the Corporate Debtor and the lack of privity of contract between the parties. - Despite claims by the appellants that the money was not repaid, the Tribunal found that there was no legal obligation on the part of the Corporate Debtor to repay the loan disbursed to the vendor. The Tribunal highlighted the lack of evidence supporting the money given as a loan, leading to the dismissal of the application under Section 7 of the IBC.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.