Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
CIRP - Dismissal of application filed u/s 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Distinction between financial debt owed by the Corporate Debtor and the lack of privity of contract between the parties. - Despite claims by the appellants that the money was not repaid, the Tribunal found that there was no legal obligation on the part of the Corporate Debtor to repay the loan disbursed to the vendor. The Tribunal highlighted the lack of evidence supporting the money given as a loan, leading to the dismissal of the application under Section 7 of the IBC.
CIRP - Dismissal of application filed u/s 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Distinction between financial debt owed by the Corporate Debtor and the lack of privity of contract between the parties. - Despite claims by the appellants that the money was not repaid, the Tribunal found that there was no legal obligation on the part of the Corporate Debtor to repay the loan disbursed to the vendor. The Tribunal highlighted the lack of evidence supporting the money given as a loan, leading to the dismissal of the application under Section 7 of the IBC.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.