Prospective valuation amendment limits reassessment: unamended fair market value reference could not justify reopening based on a registered valuer's ...
Exemption for examination-related services rejected where recipients were commercial entities; suppression sustained extended limitation and penalties...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1501 to 1520 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition on Account of LTCG u/s 50C - The appellant contended that the property was a litigated property, and thus not possible to sell at market rate, arguing that the provisions of section 50C should not apply. The appellant also highlighted that the difference between the valuation adopted by the Stamp Valuation Authority and that declared by the appellant was less than 10%, suggesting that the value declared by the appellant should be accepted. The ITAT, referring to a similar case involving Bhojison Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., where the tribunal allowed the appeal favoring the appellant, found that the appellant's case was directly covered by this decision.
Addition on Account of LTCG u/s 50C - The appellant contended that the property was a litigated property, and thus not possible to sell at market rate, arguing that the provisions of section 50C should not apply. The appellant also highlighted that the difference between the valuation adopted by the Stamp Valuation Authority and that declared by the appellant was less than 10%, suggesting that the value declared by the appellant should be accepted. The ITAT, referring to a similar case involving Bhojison Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., where the tribunal allowed the appeal favoring the appellant, found that the appellant's case was directly covered by this decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
