Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition on Account of LTCG u/s 50C - The appellant contended that the property was a litigated property, and thus not possible to sell at market rate, arguing that the provisions of section 50C should not apply. The appellant also highlighted that the difference between the valuation adopted by the Stamp Valuation Authority and that declared by the appellant was less than 10%, suggesting that the value declared by the appellant should be accepted. The ITAT, referring to a similar case involving Bhojison Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., where the tribunal allowed the appeal favoring the appellant, found that the appellant's case was directly covered by this decision.
Addition on Account of LTCG u/s 50C - The appellant contended that the property was a litigated property, and thus not possible to sell at market rate, arguing that the provisions of section 50C should not apply. The appellant also highlighted that the difference between the valuation adopted by the Stamp Valuation Authority and that declared by the appellant was less than 10%, suggesting that the value declared by the appellant should be accepted. The ITAT, referring to a similar case involving Bhojison Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., where the tribunal allowed the appeal favoring the appellant, found that the appellant's case was directly covered by this decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
