Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Validity of reassessment order - disallowance of ITC claim - The court examined the provisions of Section 29 of the Act, which pertains to the assessment of tax on turnover escaped from assessment. It was determined that the scope of reassessment under Section 29 did not include the recomputation of ITC or RITC. The court noted that ITC is an allowance and not part of the determination of turnover or tax liability. Therefore, the jurisdiction to reassess did not arise under Section 29 of the Act for RITC, making the reassessment proceedings against the petitioner without jurisdiction.
Validity of reassessment order - disallowance of ITC claim - The court examined the provisions of Section 29 of the Act, which pertains to the assessment of tax on turnover escaped from assessment. It was determined that the scope of reassessment under Section 29 did not include the recomputation of ITC or RITC. The court noted that ITC is an allowance and not part of the determination of turnover or tax liability. Therefore, the jurisdiction to reassess did not arise under Section 29 of the Act for RITC, making the reassessment proceedings against the petitioner without jurisdiction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
