Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
Validity of reassessment order - disallowance of ITC claim - The court examined the provisions of Section 29 of the Act, which pertains to the assessment of tax on turnover escaped from assessment. It was determined that the scope of reassessment under Section 29 did not include the recomputation of ITC or RITC. The court noted that ITC is an allowance and not part of the determination of turnover or tax liability. Therefore, the jurisdiction to reassess did not arise under Section 29 of the Act for RITC, making the reassessment proceedings against the petitioner without jurisdiction.
Validity of reassessment order - disallowance of ITC claim - The court examined the provisions of Section 29 of the Act, which pertains to the assessment of tax on turnover escaped from assessment. It was determined that the scope of reassessment under Section 29 did not include the recomputation of ITC or RITC. The court noted that ITC is an allowance and not part of the determination of turnover or tax liability. Therefore, the jurisdiction to reassess did not arise under Section 29 of the Act for RITC, making the reassessment proceedings against the petitioner without jurisdiction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.