Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Validity of reassessment order - disallowance of ITC claim - The court examined the provisions of Section 29 of the Act, which pertains to the assessment of tax on turnover escaped from assessment. It was determined that the scope of reassessment under Section 29 did not include the recomputation of ITC or RITC. The court noted that ITC is an allowance and not part of the determination of turnover or tax liability. Therefore, the jurisdiction to reassess did not arise under Section 29 of the Act for RITC, making the reassessment proceedings against the petitioner without jurisdiction.
Validity of reassessment order - disallowance of ITC claim - The court examined the provisions of Section 29 of the Act, which pertains to the assessment of tax on turnover escaped from assessment. It was determined that the scope of reassessment under Section 29 did not include the recomputation of ITC or RITC. The court noted that ITC is an allowance and not part of the determination of turnover or tax liability. Therefore, the jurisdiction to reassess did not arise under Section 29 of the Act for RITC, making the reassessment proceedings against the petitioner without jurisdiction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.