Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Validity of reassessment order - disallowance of ITC claim - The court examined the provisions of Section 29 of the Act, which pertains to the assessment of tax on turnover escaped from assessment. It was determined that the scope of reassessment under Section 29 did not include the recomputation of ITC or RITC. The court noted that ITC is an allowance and not part of the determination of turnover or tax liability. Therefore, the jurisdiction to reassess did not arise under Section 29 of the Act for RITC, making the reassessment proceedings against the petitioner without jurisdiction.
Validity of reassessment order - disallowance of ITC claim - The court examined the provisions of Section 29 of the Act, which pertains to the assessment of tax on turnover escaped from assessment. It was determined that the scope of reassessment under Section 29 did not include the recomputation of ITC or RITC. The court noted that ITC is an allowance and not part of the determination of turnover or tax liability. Therefore, the jurisdiction to reassess did not arise under Section 29 of the Act for RITC, making the reassessment proceedings against the petitioner without jurisdiction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.