Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Validity of Assessment u/s 153A - no search conducted u/s 132 and 132A as against the petitioner - Incriminating material from laptop - Electronic evidence admissibility - The High court concluded that the proceedings initiated u/s 153A, including the assessment order and demand notice based on the flawed panchnama and unauthorized search, were without jurisdiction and authority. Consequently, the court quashed the notice, assessment order, and demand notice, declaring the proceedings non-est and void ab initio.
Validity of Assessment u/s 153A - no search conducted u/s 132 and 132A as against the petitioner - Incriminating material from laptop - Electronic evidence admissibility - The High court concluded that the proceedings initiated u/s 153A, including the assessment order and demand notice based on the flawed panchnama and unauthorized search, were without jurisdiction and authority. Consequently, the court quashed the notice, assessment order, and demand notice, declaring the proceedings non-est and void ab initio.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.