Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Validity of Assessment u/s 153A - no search conducted u/s 132 and 132A as against the petitioner - Incriminating material from laptop - Electronic evidence admissibility - The High court concluded that the proceedings initiated u/s 153A, including the assessment order and demand notice based on the flawed panchnama and unauthorized search, were without jurisdiction and authority. Consequently, the court quashed the notice, assessment order, and demand notice, declaring the proceedings non-est and void ab initio.
Validity of Assessment u/s 153A - no search conducted u/s 132 and 132A as against the petitioner - Incriminating material from laptop - Electronic evidence admissibility - The High court concluded that the proceedings initiated u/s 153A, including the assessment order and demand notice based on the flawed panchnama and unauthorized search, were without jurisdiction and authority. Consequently, the court quashed the notice, assessment order, and demand notice, declaring the proceedings non-est and void ab initio.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.