Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Validity of Assessment u/s 153A - no search conducted u/s 132 and 132A as against the petitioner - Incriminating material from laptop - Electronic evidence admissibility - The High court concluded that the proceedings initiated u/s 153A, including the assessment order and demand notice based on the flawed panchnama and unauthorized search, were without jurisdiction and authority. Consequently, the court quashed the notice, assessment order, and demand notice, declaring the proceedings non-est and void ab initio.
Validity of Assessment u/s 153A - no search conducted u/s 132 and 132A as against the petitioner - Incriminating material from laptop - Electronic evidence admissibility - The High court concluded that the proceedings initiated u/s 153A, including the assessment order and demand notice based on the flawed panchnama and unauthorized search, were without jurisdiction and authority. Consequently, the court quashed the notice, assessment order, and demand notice, declaring the proceedings non-est and void ab initio.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
