Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Invocation of constitutional jurisdiction under Article 32 - seeking directions relating to the conservation of the species - Right to a healthy environment and freedom from adverse effects of climate change - Balance between conservation efforts and renewable energy development. - The Supreme Court modified its 2021 judgment, acknowledging the need for a balanced approach that considers both the conservation of the Great Indian Bustard and India's renewable energy goals. The court directed the formation of an Expert Committee to reassess the feasibility of underground power lines and recommend appropriate measures. The judgment reaffirmed India's commitment to its international climate obligations and the right to a healthy environment.
Invocation of constitutional jurisdiction under Article 32 - seeking directions relating to the conservation of the species - Right to a healthy environment and freedom from adverse effects of climate change - Balance between conservation efforts and renewable energy development. - The Supreme Court modified its 2021 judgment, acknowledging the need for a balanced approach that considers both the conservation of the Great Indian Bustard and India's renewable energy goals. The court directed the formation of an Expert Committee to reassess the feasibility of underground power lines and recommend appropriate measures. The judgment reaffirmed India's commitment to its international climate obligations and the right to a healthy environment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.