Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Invocation of constitutional jurisdiction under Article 32 - seeking directions relating to the conservation of the species - Right to a healthy environment and freedom from adverse effects of climate change - Balance between conservation efforts and renewable energy development. - The Supreme Court modified its 2021 judgment, acknowledging the need for a balanced approach that considers both the conservation of the Great Indian Bustard and India's renewable energy goals. The court directed the formation of an Expert Committee to reassess the feasibility of underground power lines and recommend appropriate measures. The judgment reaffirmed India's commitment to its international climate obligations and the right to a healthy environment.
Invocation of constitutional jurisdiction under Article 32 - seeking directions relating to the conservation of the species - Right to a healthy environment and freedom from adverse effects of climate change - Balance between conservation efforts and renewable energy development. - The Supreme Court modified its 2021 judgment, acknowledging the need for a balanced approach that considers both the conservation of the Great Indian Bustard and India's renewable energy goals. The court directed the formation of an Expert Committee to reassess the feasibility of underground power lines and recommend appropriate measures. The judgment reaffirmed India's commitment to its international climate obligations and the right to a healthy environment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.