Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1521 to 1540 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition u/s 50C r.w.s. 56(2)(vii) (b) - the buyer of the property - The Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that since the assesses were buyers, Section 50C did not apply, and Section 56(2)(vii)(b) did not apply as the property was not acquired without consideration. The retrospective application of Section 56(2)(vii)(b) was also rejected. Additionally, the Tribunal found no grounds for addition under Section 69C, as no show cause notice was issued and the initial addition was not sustained. Consequently, the appeals by both assesses were allowed. Additionally, the Tribunal found no grounds for addition under Section 69C, as no show cause notice was issued and the initial addition was not sustained.
Addition u/s 50C r.w.s. 56(2)(vii) (b) - the buyer of the property - The Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that since the assesses were buyers, Section 50C did not apply, and Section 56(2)(vii)(b) did not apply as the property was not acquired without consideration. The retrospective application of Section 56(2)(vii)(b) was also rejected. Additionally, the Tribunal found no grounds for addition under Section 69C, as no show cause notice was issued and the initial addition was not sustained. Consequently, the appeals by both assesses were allowed. Additionally, the Tribunal found no grounds for addition under Section 69C, as no show cause notice was issued and the initial addition was not sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
