Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Addition u/s 50C r.w.s. 56(2)(vii) (b) - the buyer of the property - The Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that since the assesses were buyers, Section 50C did not apply, and Section 56(2)(vii)(b) did not apply as the property was not acquired without consideration. The retrospective application of Section 56(2)(vii)(b) was also rejected. Additionally, the Tribunal found no grounds for addition under Section 69C, as no show cause notice was issued and the initial addition was not sustained. Consequently, the appeals by both assesses were allowed. Additionally, the Tribunal found no grounds for addition under Section 69C, as no show cause notice was issued and the initial addition was not sustained.
Addition u/s 50C r.w.s. 56(2)(vii) (b) - the buyer of the property - The Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that since the assesses were buyers, Section 50C did not apply, and Section 56(2)(vii)(b) did not apply as the property was not acquired without consideration. The retrospective application of Section 56(2)(vii)(b) was also rejected. Additionally, the Tribunal found no grounds for addition under Section 69C, as no show cause notice was issued and the initial addition was not sustained. Consequently, the appeals by both assesses were allowed. Additionally, the Tribunal found no grounds for addition under Section 69C, as no show cause notice was issued and the initial addition was not sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
