Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1521 to 1540 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Assessment against non existent company - name of company struck off by ROC - Assessment based on Seized Materials - The Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer was aware of the company's non-existence but proceeded with the assessment. It ruled that the assessment orders passed in the name of a non-existing company were void ab initio, as they lacked jurisdictional validity. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the entire assessment proceedings and allowed the cross objections filed by the assessee, dismissing the appeals filed by the Revenue.
Assessment against non existent company - name of company struck off by ROC - Assessment based on Seized Materials - The Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer was aware of the company's non-existence but proceeded with the assessment. It ruled that the assessment orders passed in the name of a non-existing company were void ab initio, as they lacked jurisdictional validity. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the entire assessment proceedings and allowed the cross objections filed by the assessee, dismissing the appeals filed by the Revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
