Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1481 to 1500 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Assessment against non existent company - name of company struck off by ROC - Assessment based on Seized Materials - The Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer was aware of the company's non-existence but proceeded with the assessment. It ruled that the assessment orders passed in the name of a non-existing company were void ab initio, as they lacked jurisdictional validity. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the entire assessment proceedings and allowed the cross objections filed by the assessee, dismissing the appeals filed by the Revenue.
Assessment against non existent company - name of company struck off by ROC - Assessment based on Seized Materials - The Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer was aware of the company's non-existence but proceeded with the assessment. It ruled that the assessment orders passed in the name of a non-existing company were void ab initio, as they lacked jurisdictional validity. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the entire assessment proceedings and allowed the cross objections filed by the assessee, dismissing the appeals filed by the Revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.