Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
901 to 920 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CENVAT Credit - exempt service or not - amount of interest received by the appellant on the delayed payment of the amount of consideration received from the sale of flats/villas/shops - The Tribunal observed that the interest received is akin to liquidated damages or compensation and does not constitute an exempted service. Therefore, the appellant is not liable for reversal of Cenvat credit based on this interest. The appellant did not perform any service to receive the interest; it was merely a deterrent for delayed payments, thus not requiring reversal of Cenvat credit.
CENVAT Credit - exempt service or not - amount of interest received by the appellant on the delayed payment of the amount of consideration received from the sale of flats/villas/shops - The Tribunal observed that the interest received is akin to liquidated damages or compensation and does not constitute an exempted service. Therefore, the appellant is not liable for reversal of Cenvat credit based on this interest. The appellant did not perform any service to receive the interest; it was merely a deterrent for delayed payments, thus not requiring reversal of Cenvat credit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
