Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 96136 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CENVAT Credit - exempt service or not - amount of interest received by the appellant on the delayed payment of the amount of consideration received from the sale of flats/villas/shops - The Tribunal observed that the interest received is akin to liquidated damages or compensation and does not constitute an exempted service. Therefore, the appellant is not liable for reversal of Cenvat credit based on this interest. The appellant did not perform any service to receive the interest; it was merely a deterrent for delayed payments, thus not requiring reversal of Cenvat credit.
CENVAT Credit - exempt service or not - amount of interest received by the appellant on the delayed payment of the amount of consideration received from the sale of flats/villas/shops - The Tribunal observed that the interest received is akin to liquidated damages or compensation and does not constitute an exempted service. Therefore, the appellant is not liable for reversal of Cenvat credit based on this interest. The appellant did not perform any service to receive the interest; it was merely a deterrent for delayed payments, thus not requiring reversal of Cenvat credit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
