Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Dishonour of Cheque - vicarious liability - Whether service of notice to the trust through its trustees suffices for the purpose of the NI Act. - The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging the trial court’s order summoning the petitioners in complaint cases filed u/s 138 NI Act. The Court held that serving notice to the trust through its trustees meets the legal requirement, making individual notices to trustees unnecessary. It further established that trustees can be held vicariously liable u/s 141 NI Act, and the amended complaints sufficiently detailed the petitioners’ involvement in the alleged transactions.
Dishonour of Cheque - vicarious liability - Whether service of notice to the trust through its trustees suffices for the purpose of the NI Act. - The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging the trial court’s order summoning the petitioners in complaint cases filed u/s 138 NI Act. The Court held that serving notice to the trust through its trustees meets the legal requirement, making individual notices to trustees unnecessary. It further established that trustees can be held vicariously liable u/s 141 NI Act, and the amended complaints sufficiently detailed the petitioners’ involvement in the alleged transactions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
