Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
441 to 460 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Service of SCN - plea of not having accessed the Portal for long period - Notices and orders were uploaded under the “View Additional Notices and Orders” tab - The primary issues were the non-traceability of demand on the GST portal, errors in ITC reporting, and the implications of the Reverse Charge Mechanism. The High Court recognized the potential confusion caused by the redesign of the GST portal, which led to the petitioner missing crucial notices. In the interest of justice, the court quashed the impugned order, provided the petitioner pays 10% of the disputed amount, and instructed the Assessing Officer to re-assess the case after giving the petitioner a fair opportunity to present his case.
Service of SCN - plea of not having accessed the Portal for long period - Notices and orders were uploaded under the “View Additional Notices and Orders” tab - The primary issues were the non-traceability of demand on the GST portal, errors in ITC reporting, and the implications of the Reverse Charge Mechanism. The High Court recognized the potential confusion caused by the redesign of the GST portal, which led to the petitioner missing crucial notices. In the interest of justice, the court quashed the impugned order, provided the petitioner pays 10% of the disputed amount, and instructed the Assessing Officer to re-assess the case after giving the petitioner a fair opportunity to present his case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
