Toy balloon tariff classification: functional heading prevails over residual rubber and festive article headings, supporting penalties for deliberate ...
Customs valuation using comparable contemporaneous imports can displace declared value, while missing speaking orders require pursuit before competent...
Foreign customs declarations and importer admissions established undervaluation, supporting sequential value redetermination, differential duty, and m...
Customs seizure safeguards prevent detention-based limitation avoidance and invalidate provisional release conditions for imported vehicles under an i...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Service of SCN - plea of not having accessed the Portal for long period - Notices and orders were uploaded under the “View Additional Notices and Orders” tab - The primary issues were the non-traceability of demand on the GST portal, errors in ITC reporting, and the implications of the Reverse Charge Mechanism. The High Court recognized the potential confusion caused by the redesign of the GST portal, which led to the petitioner missing crucial notices. In the interest of justice, the court quashed the impugned order, provided the petitioner pays 10% of the disputed amount, and instructed the Assessing Officer to re-assess the case after giving the petitioner a fair opportunity to present his case.
Service of SCN - plea of not having accessed the Portal for long period - Notices and orders were uploaded under the “View Additional Notices and Orders” tab - The primary issues were the non-traceability of demand on the GST portal, errors in ITC reporting, and the implications of the Reverse Charge Mechanism. The High Court recognized the potential confusion caused by the redesign of the GST portal, which led to the petitioner missing crucial notices. In the interest of justice, the court quashed the impugned order, provided the petitioner pays 10% of the disputed amount, and instructed the Assessing Officer to re-assess the case after giving the petitioner a fair opportunity to present his case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.