Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
Penalty order - Part-B of the e-way bill was not filled up - intent to evade tax - The High court, referencing a previous judgment, ruled that such technical errors, in the absence of intent to evade tax, should not attract penalties. Consequently, the court quashed the penalty orders against the petitioner, emphasizing that the mistake was merely technical and did not constitute tax evasion.
Penalty order - Part-B of the e-way bill was not filled up - intent to evade tax - The High court, referencing a previous judgment, ruled that such technical errors, in the absence of intent to evade tax, should not attract penalties. Consequently, the court quashed the penalty orders against the petitioner, emphasizing that the mistake was merely technical and did not constitute tax evasion.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.