Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty order - Part-B of the e-way bill was not filled up - intent to evade tax - The High court, referencing a previous judgment, ruled that such technical errors, in the absence of intent to evade tax, should not attract penalties. Consequently, the court quashed the penalty orders against the petitioner, emphasizing that the mistake was merely technical and did not constitute tax evasion.
Penalty order - Part-B of the e-way bill was not filled up - intent to evade tax - The High court, referencing a previous judgment, ruled that such technical errors, in the absence of intent to evade tax, should not attract penalties. Consequently, the court quashed the penalty orders against the petitioner, emphasizing that the mistake was merely technical and did not constitute tax evasion.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.