Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rejection of section 9 application - Initiation of CIRP - prior dispute in relation to existence of debt or not - The Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) noted that the Mandate Letter contained ambiguities regarding the liable party for fee payments and supported the Adjudicating Authority’s view that the obligation to pay arose only upon raising of debit notes not proforma invoices, as per the Mandate Letter. Additionally, the Tribunal highlighted the engagement of IDBI Capital for similar services, which further indicated a dispute. - Applying the principles laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Mobilox Innovations v. Kirusa Software, the Tribunal concluded that the pre-existing disputes were not frivolous or spurious and required further investigation.
Rejection of section 9 application - Initiation of CIRP - prior dispute in relation to existence of debt or not - The Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) noted that the Mandate Letter contained ambiguities regarding the liable party for fee payments and supported the Adjudicating Authority’s view that the obligation to pay arose only upon raising of debit notes not proforma invoices, as per the Mandate Letter. Additionally, the Tribunal highlighted the engagement of IDBI Capital for similar services, which further indicated a dispute. - Applying the principles laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Mobilox Innovations v. Kirusa Software, the Tribunal concluded that the pre-existing disputes were not frivolous or spurious and required further investigation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
