Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Oppression and mismanagement - reduction in shareholding - illegal transfer and allotment of shares - The NCLAT observed that, the appellants did not fully comply with the NCLAT’s order dated 16.04.2019, specifically regarding the rectification of the register of members to reflect the shareholding status as of 19.05.2010. The fresh transfer of shares on 28.11.2017 was invalidated, as it was an attempt to circumvent the Tribunal’s previous orders. The appellants were found to have engaged in acts of oppression and mismanagement, justifying the respondents’ claims. The appellants did not properly offer proportionate shares from additional allotments to the respondents, violating the Tribunal’s directives. - The Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) upheld the NCLT’s findings that the appellants engaged in improper share transfers and failed to comply with the Tribunal’s orders.
Oppression and mismanagement - reduction in shareholding - illegal transfer and allotment of shares - The NCLAT observed that, the appellants did not fully comply with the NCLAT’s order dated 16.04.2019, specifically regarding the rectification of the register of members to reflect the shareholding status as of 19.05.2010. The fresh transfer of shares on 28.11.2017 was invalidated, as it was an attempt to circumvent the Tribunal’s previous orders. The appellants were found to have engaged in acts of oppression and mismanagement, justifying the respondents’ claims. The appellants did not properly offer proportionate shares from additional allotments to the respondents, violating the Tribunal’s directives. - The Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) upheld the NCLT’s findings that the appellants engaged in improper share transfers and failed to comply with the Tribunal’s orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
